Repository | Book | Chapter
(1981) Inquiries and provocations, Dordrecht, Springer.
The aim of this brief essay is to present some conjectures as to how Hume might have criticized certain central epistemological doctrines of Kant.1 By a natural extension of this theme I shall also raise a few questions concerning Karl Popper's views on induction and his critique of the empiricist meaning criterion. I do this in the spirit of my very great admiration for Popper's work and his friendship, which I cherish sincerely. If I have misunderstood his basic outlook, I hope that he will set me right in future discussions.
Publication details
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-010-9426-9_10
Full citation:
Feigl, H. (1981). What Hume might have said to Kant, in Inquiries and provocations, Dordrecht, Springer, pp. 164-170.
This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.