Repository | Book | Chapter
![176128](https://sdvigpress.org/images/publi/_default.jpg)
(2006) Literature and philosophy, Dordrecht, Springer.
Literature, for philosophy and for philosophers, is like the "Irish Question' for nineteenth-century British politicians. Not only does "the literary' resemble a colonized land which, at once both inside and outside the imperial power of "philosophy', continuously disturbs the seemingly ordered doings of the colonizing centre, but also, as soon as a "philosophical' answer to the problem is arrived at, the question — the subjects — change. Of course, this is in part what Jacques Derrida is hinting at when he discusses the "strange institution' of literature. More prosaically, it reflects a common and important teaching experience: for every assertion about literature, a literary counter-example can be found; for nearly every interpretation another equally plausible interpretation can be discussed. These pedagogic experiences are not just accidents, but, I suspect, deeply ingrained in the very experience of the literary.
Publication details
Full citation:
Eaglestone, R. (2006)., Philosophy's metaphors: Dennett, Midgley, and Derrida, in D. Rudrum (ed.), Literature and philosophy, Dordrecht, Springer, pp. 194-203.
This document is unfortunately not available for download at the moment.